We have all been there: we go to the doctor with an aching back, she gives us a diagnosis, and writes out a prescription for some pain killers, along with some medical advice of what we can and cannot do. We take the pills, follow the advice, and the problem goes away. Or does it? Two months later, we pick up a heavy suitcase and injure our back once again - and start the vicious cycle of doctor-pills-advice all over again.
Getting rid of a physical injury can often be an uphill battle, unless you can find a way to eradicate the problem entirely. Osteopaths are effective in not only fighting the battle, but winning the war. The fundamental difference between a General Practitioner and a Osteopathic Doctor is that GPs merely treat the symptoms of an ailments, whereas osteopaths will look at the whole body in attempt to cure the cause of the problem. There are many other ways to distinguish an osteopath from a medical doctor:
1. Osteopathic doctors are more specialized in the anatomic workings of the body. They receive special training in the musculoskeletal system, while medical doctors merely have a general background knowledge. Osteopaths therefore have a therapeutic as well as diagnostic advantage; they know how one system in the body affects the other in greater detail.
2. Osteopaths also undergo something referred to as Osteopathic Manipulative Training (OMT). This is a special diagnosis technique using one's hands. This technique stimulates the blood to flow to the target areas, serving as a much more natural way of diagnosing a disease.
3. Osteopaths also use their hands to manipulate the muscles in your body to cure the problem (not only to diagnose). Where Medical doctors will use recommend rest and prescribe anti-inflammatory medication, Osteopaths employ a much more natural approach. By loosening up muscle tensions and stimulating blood flow, they encourage the body to engage in its own healing processes, leading to the elimination of the problem entirely.
4. Osteopaths looks at history of the problem, while doctors deal with the symptoms at hand. If a patient has a problem with his knee, for instance, a medical doctor would take a patient's history through means of laboratory-type procedure, such as blood tests and other physical examinations. An osteopath would acquire this same history by asking the patient whether the knee joints were stiff in the past, whether the pain becomes worse when the leg is placed in a different position, or if increase activity had worsened the problem in the past. By delving into a patient's history, osteopathic doctors attempt to discover the root of the problem, and proceed to tackle it at the source.
The benefits of osteopathy are therefore numerous, but do they override the advantages of visiting your local GP? That is for you to decide. Depending on the nature of your ailment, you might even want to see both. The primary question you have to ask yourself whether your physical problem is a reoccurring one, and whether you want to treat the symptoms, or cure the disease. - 14130
Getting rid of a physical injury can often be an uphill battle, unless you can find a way to eradicate the problem entirely. Osteopaths are effective in not only fighting the battle, but winning the war. The fundamental difference between a General Practitioner and a Osteopathic Doctor is that GPs merely treat the symptoms of an ailments, whereas osteopaths will look at the whole body in attempt to cure the cause of the problem. There are many other ways to distinguish an osteopath from a medical doctor:
1. Osteopathic doctors are more specialized in the anatomic workings of the body. They receive special training in the musculoskeletal system, while medical doctors merely have a general background knowledge. Osteopaths therefore have a therapeutic as well as diagnostic advantage; they know how one system in the body affects the other in greater detail.
2. Osteopaths also undergo something referred to as Osteopathic Manipulative Training (OMT). This is a special diagnosis technique using one's hands. This technique stimulates the blood to flow to the target areas, serving as a much more natural way of diagnosing a disease.
3. Osteopaths also use their hands to manipulate the muscles in your body to cure the problem (not only to diagnose). Where Medical doctors will use recommend rest and prescribe anti-inflammatory medication, Osteopaths employ a much more natural approach. By loosening up muscle tensions and stimulating blood flow, they encourage the body to engage in its own healing processes, leading to the elimination of the problem entirely.
4. Osteopaths looks at history of the problem, while doctors deal with the symptoms at hand. If a patient has a problem with his knee, for instance, a medical doctor would take a patient's history through means of laboratory-type procedure, such as blood tests and other physical examinations. An osteopath would acquire this same history by asking the patient whether the knee joints were stiff in the past, whether the pain becomes worse when the leg is placed in a different position, or if increase activity had worsened the problem in the past. By delving into a patient's history, osteopathic doctors attempt to discover the root of the problem, and proceed to tackle it at the source.
The benefits of osteopathy are therefore numerous, but do they override the advantages of visiting your local GP? That is for you to decide. Depending on the nature of your ailment, you might even want to see both. The primary question you have to ask yourself whether your physical problem is a reoccurring one, and whether you want to treat the symptoms, or cure the disease. - 14130
About the Author:
Andrew Mitchell, co-ordinator of Osteopath Network, writes articles about osteopathy, back pain, neck pain and soft tissue injuries. If you are looking for a Leeds osteopath or for an osteopath in the UK please visit his website.
No comments:
Post a Comment